Education only. Not medical advice • Compounds via JP Research, research use only • For research & informational use
Field Guide›Healing & Recovery›Larazotide
Healing & Recovery

Larazotide

larazotide acetate · AT-1001 · INN-202 · the zonulin antagonist · oral, not injected

An eight amino acid oral peptide designed to tighten the junctions between gut cells rather than to be absorbed. It got further through clinical development than almost anything else on this site, and then its phase 3 trial was stopped for futility.

📝 Community guide · reviewed by Carl · Suggest an edit
Carl reading the research Carl read the papers
so you don’t have to.

What it actually is

Larazotide is a single chain peptide of eight amino acids that acts as a tight junction regulator. It was designed to work in the gut lumen and is described in the literature as locally acting and non-systemic, so it is taken as a capsule and acts on the cells it passes.

The mechanism is framed as blocking zonulin, the protein that opens tight junctions, and it has been linked to redistribution of tight junction proteins and actin, and to inhibition of myosin light chain kinase. The target condition was coeliac disease in people who still had symptoms despite a gluten-free diet.

Carl’s one-liner: The leaky gut peptide that actually reached phase 3. The result is the reason to read this one carefully.

How it’s thought to work

What the research says

An unusual amount of it, and the ending matters. The largest completed trial randomised 342 adults with coeliac disease and persistent symptoms on a gluten-free diet to larazotide 0.5, 1 or 2 mg three times daily for 12 weeks: only the 0.5 mg dose beat placebo, and the 1 and 2 mg doses were no different from placebo on any endpoint. An earlier gluten challenge study of 184 patients tested 1, 4 and 8 mg three times daily against 2.7 g of gluten a day for 6 weeks, and found a symptom benefit at 1 mg but no difference in the lactulose-to-mannitol permeability measure. A meta-analysis of four randomised trials (626 patients) found no significant effect on that permeability ratio, with symptom benefit only under gluten challenge. The phase 3 trial was stopped in June 2022: an interim analysis after the 12 week double-blind portion in about half the target enrolment concluded that the extra patients needed to show a significant effect were too many to justify continuing. A separate phase 2a in 12 children with post-COVID multisystem inflammatory syndrome reported no larazotide-related adverse events and faster symptom resolution.

Reported protocols

These are the doses the peptide community actually reports running (Reddit & forums), alongside published research — logged for education, not as a recommendation to use.

ParameterCommonly reported range
Trial dose0.5 mg three times daily, as capsules. That is the only dose that beat placebo in the 342-patient trial, and the phase 3 tested 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg three times daily
The inverted-UHigher is worse here, demonstrably: 1 mg and 2 mg three times daily were indistinguishable from placebo on every endpoint in the same trial. The authors suggested peptide aggregation at higher doses as one possible reason
RouteOral capsule. Nothing is injected, which also means nothing is reconstituted
DurationThe 342-patient trial ran 12 weeks of treatment between placebo run-in and run-out phases; the phase 3's efficacy portion was also 12 weeks
Community doseNot established from independent sources. The figures online are the trial dose, repeated by vendor pages, and no credible first-hand write-ups turned up
Carl's noteThe dose-response curve is the single most important thing to know here, and it is the first thing people get wrong when they assume a bigger capsule is a stronger one.
Reality check: Larazotide is not approved anywhere, for anything. Its phase 3 trial was terminated in 2022 after the sponsor concluded that the number of extra patients needed to show a significant effect was too large to support continuing. It is not registered with SAHPRA. SAHPRA's May 2026 warning names nine peptides as examples of illegally marketed products rather than as a closed list, and the registration rule behind it covers anything sold here to treat or alter how the body works, which this is. It is also worth saying plainly that leaky gut is not a diagnosis: intestinal permeability is a real measurable thing, but the meta-analysis of larazotide's own trials found the permeability ratio did not move even while symptoms improved under gluten challenge. For athletes, substances with no approval anywhere fall under WADA S0, prohibited at all times, although larazotide is not named on the list.

Common use cases

GoalCommunity protocol notes
Coeliac symptoms despite a gluten-free dietthe condition it was built for, where the 342-patient trial found a modest benefit at 0.5 mg and the phase 3 failed to confirm it
Gut barrier researchwhere it earns its keep: a specific tool for a specific junction mechanism
General leaky gut usethe reason most people search for it, and the use with the least evidence behind it

Mixing it (reconstitution)

Freeze-dried peptides must be reconstituted with bacteriostatic water before they can be measured. Carl’s calculator turns “mg in the vial + ml of water + target dose” into “units on the syringe” — and tells you how long the vial lasts.

→ Open the Reconstitution Calculator

Injection & handling

There is nothing to inject, which makes this one of the few entries here you cannot get wrong with a syringe. Larazotide is an oral capsule and the whole design relies on it staying in the gut, so the formulation matters more than the dose does: the phase 3 used enteric-coated beads in gelatin capsules so the peptide survives the stomach and is released where it is meant to work. A raw powder bought as research material has none of that, and dissolving a gut-acting peptide into water and drinking it is not the same product the trials tested. Store capsules as supplied, in a cool dry place.

Stacks it appears in

Sources

  1. Leffler DA et al. Larazotide acetate for persistent symptoms of celiac disease despite a gluten-free diet: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2015 (PMID 25683116, PMC4446229)
  2. Kelly CP et al. Larazotide acetate in patients with coeliac disease undergoing a gluten challenge. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013 (PMID 23163616)
  3. Hoilat GJ et al. Larazotide acetate for treatment of celiac disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2022 (PMID 34339872)
  4. Slifer ZM et al. Larazotide acetate: a pharmacological peptide approach to tight junction regulation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2021 (PMID 33881350)
  5. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03569007 (CeD-LA-3001, phase 3, terminated)
  6. 9 Meters Biopharma press release, 21 June 2022 (interim analysis does not support trial continuation), SEC EDGAR
  7. Yonker LM et al. Viral spike antigen clearance and augmented recovery in children with post-COVID MIS treated with larazotide. Sci Transl Med 2025 (PMID 40737433)
  8. SAHPRA registered health products register (no larazotide product)
  9. SAHPRA, Peptide Products public information page (May 2026)
  10. WADA 2026 Prohibited List, S0 non-approved substances

Carl’s quick FAQ

Does it let coeliacs eat gluten?
No, and it was never tested that way. The trials kept patients on a gluten-free diet, or used a controlled gluten challenge of about 2.4 to 2.7 g a day under supervision.
Why did the phase 3 fail?
The interim analysis estimated the number of patients needed to show a statistically significant effect, and the answer was more than the trial could enrol. That is a futility result, not a safety one.
Is more better?
Measurably not. In the 342-patient trial, 0.5 mg beat placebo while 1 mg and 2 mg did not, in the same study, at the same time.
Does it fix leaky gut?
The pooled trial data says it did not change the lactulose-to-mannitol permeability ratio. Whatever symptom benefit was seen did not track that measure.
The honest summary: Larazotide is the most thoroughly tested compound in this corner of the site, and that is exactly why it is a cautionary one: it had a plausible mechanism, decent mid-stage signals, real money behind it, and it still did not clear phase 3. The safety record looks fine, the dose-response is the opposite of what people assume, and the permeability endpoint it was built around never moved. Anyone buying it for general gut health is buying a drug that failed at the one condition it was designed for, in the population most likely to benefit.
Carl
📩 The Field Notes

Liked this breakdown?

Carl sends one like it every week — plus the free Beginner’s Field Notes PDF. Plain English, zero hype, unsubscribe anytime.

Free. We’ll never sell your email. Education only — not medical advice.
RELATED

Keep reading